<2022-03-29T00:20:13.000Z> pussymagic: Say, friend
<2022-04-03T17:00:00.000Z> imperiumpress: Hello
<2022-05-08T22:09:57.000Z> pussymagic: brosey
<2022-05-08T22:10:10.000Z> pussymagic: by way of introduction, I'm an old forum poster on a variety of places
<2022-05-08T22:10:25.000Z> pussymagic: quite frequently post joel's stuff, so you're in there too
<2022-05-08T22:12:23.000Z> pussymagic: question for you- what would it take to get you to delete your face dox vid?  
<2022-05-08T22:13:17.000Z> pussymagic: I'm afraid this isn't the smartest thing to do, even though in the immediate moment there aren't apparent consequences
<2022-05-09T19:17:35.000Z> pussymagic: Additionally, homie, you replied to a comment on your imperium channel from your personal youtube account.  
<2022-05-10T16:43:35.000Z> imperiumpress: I had thought about deleting it anyway because there's not much value in leaving it up. But why were you advising to delete it?
<2022-05-13T02:22:47.000Z> pussymagic: Yeah everyone who's following you, who would need to see it, already has.  You should pop it down now.  
<2022-05-13T02:22:54.000Z> pussymagic: Ton of reasons
<2022-05-13T02:29:24.000Z> pussymagic: I've listened to joels intellectual development since he first popped up on dylan's channel.  At one point, he was using phrase "epistemic sincerity" as necessary if not advantageous attribute to whatever approach we take forward.  Western europeans innately argue towards realism to ground themselves.  I think this is more a cognitive artifact of our intellectual tradition than it is demonstrable benefit, especially when you take into account our station - starting from bottom, essentially powerless.  This is also a marked tendency in WN 1.0 - being "real" and true and public was first step to taking on "
<2022-05-13T02:30:01.000Z> pussymagic: system" and winning.  Which of course never happened, they failed epically.  Mostly by getting tied up by powers that be.  
<2022-05-13T02:31:27.000Z> pussymagic: So I think preserving your viability and freedom to act is much much more paramount.  NOT getting tied up by whatever authority they want to send your way - provided they can locate you - to tie you up and take you off your game, take up your time defending yourself against whatever accusation they choose.  
<2022-05-13T02:33:01.000Z> pussymagic: That's another thing that concerns me for both of you guys - you already have hate speech laws on books.  There were a lot of aussies active in TRS sphere in earlier days.  Some dropped because of bad strategic choices made by primary guys in that crew, but an entire wave of dingos deleted accounts right after hate speech law was passed.  
<2022-05-13T02:34:48.000Z> pussymagic: The thing you have to remember with any of these hate speech laws (or anything else really) is that what you say "you meant", or any other defense, doesn't really matter.  They alone hold prerogative to make accusations, prosecute, take up your time and $$, and usually prevail - all the while you could have been using your time to move your own life, biz, movement forward.  
<2022-05-13T03:00:49.000Z> pussymagic: Joel knows who this guy is.  If you ever hear him, his shtick leans heavily on fallacy of appeal to authority.  A lot of the misfit crew he attracts as an audience admittedly is not that bright.  He himself is clearly accomplished, but there are a ton of tells that suggest he's also connected to intelligence services.  He did a stream several months ago on an episode you and Joel put out- he was very excited about Joel's interest in history as means of theoretical falsifiablity.   So he does these review streams where he plays your stream and does commentary over top.  In the beginning of the stream he of course strikes his usual pose - appeal to authority.  So he makes these claims that he knows who joel is, has been aware of him for years, that joel is very promising intellect, came online under different screenname that he won't mention (referring to dick dickenson handle joel first used), that joel must have been about 18 or 20 - I forget the exact claim.  So I'm listening to introduction to this stream, and having watched ralph for a while, am accustomed to his general posturing, that of authority, data scientist, etc., but I realize 1) he doesn't really know who Joel is because Joel's latest evolution would contradict with ideas core to Ralphs shtick, and 2) it strikes me that these details he's rattling off about Joel must be coming from general database somewhere, something tracking online footprints.  There are a ton of comments dropped here and there within ralph's streams that suggest he's consulting some kind of data bank overseas.  Some of his comments are quite menacing - the israelis are going to eternally track "antisemites" etc.  Anywho- his entire interest in Joel blows up because Joel came on end of his stream and shits on ralph's philosemitism, and - incidentally - the crew of nosebergs he actually called to appear on stream specifically to interact with Joel - ralph is looking for someone inside "movement" to carry his banner.  One of the bergs on the stream said in passing that ralph had called him on short notice to show up on this joel stream.  So anyway, Joel takes a shit on the whole thing which anyone who's listened to Joel knew would happen, thus rendering the stream an hilarious failure.  Joel is not going to be ralphs philosemite young voice, oh well.  
<2022-05-13T03:01:43.000Z> pussymagic: FYI - it's looking like some of these messages are not sending or sending out of sequence.  This UI sucks.  
<2022-05-13T03:03:08.000Z> pussymagic: Anyway - assuming everything written so far has gone through - the reason I'm telling YOU this is because you don't want your personal data out there getting scooped up by this guys (or anyone elses) data mining efforts.  Ya dig?  
<2022-05-13T03:05:46.000Z> pussymagic: Resend- these lines belong before "joel knows who this guy is":  Another thing that's out there floating under surface- have you ever heard of this guy "ralph" over in UK / Germany? Indian tech head, middle aged, ostensibly working on a tech product to help target and canvas UK voters on nationalist causes. Use technology to aggregate and activate voters around any issue we can find advantage in and formalize a means of keeping constant pressure on reps.this is all very good. However... I'm about certain his tech back end is in Israel. And pretty sure he's working on contract for someone. I've followed his content / project since he first popped up on channel of another UK nationalist, Simon Harris, who unfortunately was an early death during first covid wave. 
<2022-06-09T02:49:28.000Z> pussymagic: Looks like you've caught the eye of sauron
<2022-06-09T02:49:31.000Z> pussymagic: youtube.com/watch?v=Ssd00lMr76s
<2022-06-09T02:51:39.000Z> pussymagic: This band of misfits participating isn't really the issue.  The issue is I'm pretty certain from the host Ralph's words his partners are Israeli.  He brags about them tracking "the antisemites for the rest of their days", threatening them, etc.  
<2022-06-09T02:53:07.000Z> pussymagic: He did a stream attacking Academic Agent, goading AA to come on the stream, and then gave AA an ultimatum of sorts, that he would open his chat groups to Ralph and purge "the antisemites", otherwise Academic Agent starting his career w/ young family would be shut down.  
<2022-06-09T02:53:21.000Z> pussymagic: Ask Academic Agent about that.  
<2022-06-09T02:54:56.000Z> pussymagic: If you could pass on a tip to AA - I strongly recommend he or someone he's close with take an spare hard drive and download Ralph's streams quietly, don't announce the project.  
<2022-06-09T02:56:22.000Z> pussymagic: This guy Ralph has announced various "stages" to his project, the next of which is he's going to delete his internet trail and surface as a respectable guy as part of his political project.  
<2022-06-09T02:58:28.000Z> pussymagic: I'd suggest saving anything you can find of his - he's mouthed off quite a bit in the past.  You or others might need recourse to his past content if he makes good on his threats to go after people.
<2022-06-09T03:15:02.000Z> pussymagic: compare
<2022-06-09T03:15:11.000Z> pussymagic: altcensored.com/watch?v=ULqu1kP8VU4
<2022-06-09T03:15:34.000Z> pussymagic: youtube.com/watch?v=hLLaM_jPGzc
<2022-11-08T15:51:42.000Z> pussymagic: Brosey Bro - I have a request / proposition for you to consider
<2022-11-08T15:52:35.000Z> pussymagic: Could you please reach out to Bond and bring back his book?  Bite the bullet on the egos involved.  This is actually the best thing "for the movement".  
<2022-11-08T15:53:16.000Z> pussymagic: The reason being is his book is the best reference to point early GenX'ers who might be inclined to break with the Boomer mindset.  
<2022-11-08T15:53:59.000Z> pussymagic: Before it was banned, I got Charles Hayward (of the worthy house) to buy a copy.  Then the whole drama kicked up.  
<2022-11-08T15:57:01.000Z> pussymagic: For clarification I don't have a side in the Bond / BAP spat.  I emailed Bond urging him to turn his attention towards Strauss as the weakest point in BAPs conceptual landscape, as well as most productive in arresting its continued influence on Boomer Right.   But I'm just an anonymous content consumer.  And Bond was too self righteous, that he simply "didn't like" BAP, and that was grounds enough.  
<2022-11-08T16:02:23.000Z> pussymagic: I also don't agree with Bond's view point that we need more centralization - don't know if he still subscribes to this, but that's what he was saying while promoting his book.  I think the Adam Katz formulation is over-determined, if not subversive.  I think the generative or emergent paradigm is correct, and its negation of a priori or timeless "metaphysics".  The "transcendent" is symbiotic to the human himself (as collective) and must be constantly reborn, cultivated, passed down and renewed.  It's not something "a priori" that we align to.  
<2022-11-08T16:03:53.000Z> pussymagic: But all of these intellectual points are beside the point.  The principal objective is breaking BoomerCons - and those in their image, the early GenX - OUT of present paradigm.  "Radicalism" is simply too much to ask.  We need an easy reference point to begin the process.  To date, that was most effectively Bond's book.  
<2022-11-08T16:06:14.000Z> pussymagic: I'm contacting you today on the topic after watching the latest Keith / Joel stream (with Jefferson Lee and Josh Neil).   A side remark by Joel that he and Keith will be dropping info on BAP as an op.  Joel, if I recall, was one to denounce Bond those months ago.  
<2022-11-08T16:10:27.000Z> pussymagic: SO now Joel's on both side of the spat.  The entire thing previously was a mistake.  Mistake that the business entity gets involved in the spats of its authors.  The "ideology wars" are themselves an artifact of the platonism plaguing western europeans.  The same issue and source of prioritizing a priori metaphysics.  
<2022-11-08T16:13:55.000Z> pussymagic: At the moment, the main "point of reference" for Boomer intellectuals and early GenXers is Moldbug, but he leads into too many directions and to ideas ultimately disadvantageous to us.  It would be preferable if we had an more succinct (and nicely packaged) resource.  That's Nemesis.  I urge you guys to simply re-establish the business relationship, to allow an avenue of influencing those totally outside all the drama to make steps themselves.  
<2022-11-08T16:24:03.000Z> pussymagic: It is beneficial to have Bond's work distributed.  I know he can do it himself, but the prior packaging was top notch.  And I think the various parties need to admit mistakes were made all around.  
<2022-11-08T16:26:51.000Z> pussymagic: Anyway, cheerio.  Hope all is well.  
<2022-11-09T04:51:51.000Z> imperiumpress: Yeah I agree that Nemesis was seminal and is still an important means of redpilling high quality people. The main issue from our end was that Bond didn't wind down the spat when we asked him to. I don't really care about making enemies of the BAP-sphere, but throwing around accusations with no evidence makes our organization look less serious. In any case I'm not averse to reaching out to him. I doubt he will be interested, but you never know.
<2022-11-20T19:19:35.000Z> pussymagic: Yeah he can be prickly.  I'm going to forward him my exchange with Charles Hayward and my remarks above.  
<2022-11-20T19:29:55.000Z> pussymagic: In regards to looking serious, I think you'll ultimately need to erect a policy or hard wall between publishing ideas for posterity, and that most of your contemporary authors are going to be "activists" in a sense, certainly intellectually.  Now we have Keith / Joel vs BAP.  Keith / Joel vs Academic Agent.  Thomass777 is personal friend with BAP.  So on and so forth.  Simply no way to keep these guys from going at it.  Did you catch BAP on Academic Agent's stream discussing Cudihhy's "The Ordeal of Civility".  This is foundational text to the BAP / Thomass777 / City Bureaucrat / Nick Salo circle.  But it's thesis is that Prot individualism - secularized Prot forms - are good, and the issue with small hats is their refusal to assimilate.  This, of course, it just liberalism.  Was running a discussion thread on it here: forum.nobodyhasthe.biz/t/bold-move-academic-agent-hosts-bronze-age-pervert/14980/ 