<2023-04-13T04:36:18.000Z> foreign: In your video about foreign replacement you seem to think that Canada has a higher chance of meaningful change than the US. I agree with you that the US infects the world with it's woke democracy, but isn't Canada suffering more from immigration? I feel like I've seen so many more stories of women getting chopped up or set ablaze while riding the bus in Canada.
<2023-04-14T01:26:30.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: it’s not that Canada has a higher chance of being saved than America, but that America, as it was founded, cannot be saved. You might know that I really don’t like democracy. Any “representative democratic” form of government pushes for equality even more fervently than communist regimes. Just as one example, in the USSR students were separated into different classes depending on their aptitudes and educational achievements. Even if they weren’t race realists, the Soviets recognized that there were innate differences between individual people. On May 17, 1957, the American military, under the order of then president Dwight D. Eisenhower, escorted black students into a school in order to enforce absolute equality between everyone. All this is to say that liberal democracy is the problem and America was founded as a revolutionary liberal democracy. It’s unthinkable for America to be anything other than a democracy because it’s literally in America’s DNA. When I listened to Nick Fuentes (i dont anymore) he used to say that the American government had been taken over by foreign interests, mainly the Israel lobby. That America today is not as the founders intended it to be. And to justify this Fuentes and others like Milo Yianoppilos would draw on quotes from the founding fathers. The one that comes off the top of my head is a quote by John Quincy Adams that goes something like “America was founded for good Christians, if any American is not a Christian then they’re not really American.” Of course the opinions of the founding fathers are important, but they obviously didn’t think being white or Christian was important enough to put it into the constitution. If they had made the 1st amendment something like “You can only have American citizenship if you’re of European decent and also Christian” we would be living in a very different world. The constitution of America made the country what it is today. The ultra-liberal ultra-lgbt America we have today is a direct consequence of the ideals of the American revolution and its constitution. In order to save America you have to radically transform it into something almost unrecognizable from its founding. Canada on the other hand was founded as a pact between very conservative French Catholics and English people who were too reactionary for America. The actual percentage of Europeans in a country does not affect its chances of being saved. An unpopular, counter-intuitive position is that if Europeans become a minority in any country the Europeans would be better able to organize themselves into an effective resistance since it’s easier to organize smaller groups of people. As it stands, Canada is 69% white and America is 58%, not that those statistics can be easily relied upon since there’s up to 30 million illegals in America and the definition of what is considered “white” on the Canadian census is a little iffy. Kazakhstan was, under the USSR, 60% Russian and 30% Kazakh. After the collapse, Kazakhstan is now like 90% Kazakh and 10% Russian because all the Russians moved back to Russia. There are some other examples of huge demographic shifts happening in a short period of time, but i think im writing too much. The scenario where a country becomes literally unsaveable because there are too many non-whites is if 20% of the farmers become non-white. Because on average urbanites have fewer children than farmers, every couple of hundred years the urban population just gets replaced by the rural one. Since farmers in both Canada and the USA are like 96% white, no matter what both countries will be able to reconstitute themselves in a long enough time span. One thing that is disturbing is the push by the Canadian government, as well as the UK, to get immigrants into farming. We know that 3% of the farmers in England are foreign born. I couldn’t get the number for Canada, but I believe around 2% of farmers in Canada are foreign born.IN MY OPINION, the chance of any European country being saved is random. History is made by great men, and a great man like Mussolini/Lenin/Hitler/Salazar being born in any country is just random. But also, there has to be the proper conditions for a great man to rise up, namely massive political instability. 
<2023-04-14T01:27:05.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: I know this is a long response, but I don't want to half ass anything. 
<2023-04-14T03:45:30.000Z> foreign: I've seen your post about the lack of a good podcast pertaining to Canadian politics. Have you ever thought that maybe you should start a podcast/livestream? The fact that you could crank out such an extensive response to a random dm seems to suggest that you would be good at it. I've also listened to Nick Fuentes & Co and while I find myself agreeing to a decent chunk of what he says, it doesn't really motivate me. I'm not sure if deleting a dm on poa.st deletes it on the other person's end. So I'm going to repeat myself: Your videos are so good I went from clicking on a random Victoria II review to looking up how to claim proof of my Canadian citizenship online over the course of an hour. (My family is from Canada even though I was born in the US.)I find a lot more value in your meme edits than I do in almost any of the other political commentators/grifters that I've forced my self to listen to throughout the years. Idk, maybe it's weird to suggest this to someone I don't know, but your content is very captivating. I think it has more to do with what you're saying as opposed to the editing than you might think.
<2023-04-15T23:44:05.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: I've tried to do more long form speaking stuff, but I'm not a good orator. Maybe if I worked on it I'd get better, but I'd prefer to specialize. Everybody wants to be livestreamer
<2023-04-15T23:45:23.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: I'm glad that you think my content is good, I myself don't see much value in it as other people do
<2023-04-15T23:48:00.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: DMs on fedi are totally insecure, they aren't encrypted and they can be read from both intances' admins. Basically, the fediverse has the same amount of encryption as regular email, but people freak out over fedi's security because it's newer than email and they're distrustful. Don't say stuff in dms that you wouldn't want 
<2023-04-15T23:48:18.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: to be leaked*
<2023-04-15T23:59:30.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: did you join fedi because of my video or were you already on?
<2023-04-16T00:13:22.000Z> foreign: I joined because of the end of your vids.
<2023-04-16T00:16:29.000Z> foreign: I'm not too worried about what I said. I'm sure the government keeps a record of pretty much all internet traffic and nothing I've said isn't already easily inferred from the content I consume online.
<2023-04-16T01:40:35.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: I wouldn't be worried about the government. I'm sure you've heard that a bigger instance called chudbuds.lol got hacked because the owner downloaded a minecraft mod with a trojan. Everything on it got leaked, including people posting their social security numbers in DMs. But because a single instance is self contained, no one else was affected
<2023-04-16T01:46:16.000Z> foreign: No I didn't hear that. https://i.poastcdn.org/75c0caefff4341c8c16575d4ace4c85fd2094cc8e21022f4f638bd2025b6d2c0.jpg
<2023-04-16T01:46:54.000Z> foreign: It's too late to worry about it now I guess
<2023-04-16T01:51:56.000Z> foreign: If there is no real security benefits to poa.st why use it over something like telegram? It's also an app so more people are likely to use it and it's more encrypted or whatever. 
<2023-04-16T03:57:35.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: telegram is a centralized service. They are a company whose bottom line is profit. On the other hand, poast, peertube, and matrix are all decentralized services. The people who run their own little instances aren't there to make money. if it came down to it, telegram would ban all dissenting opinions to stay profitable
<2023-04-16T04:00:09.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: ever since the mass bannings of 2017, we've lost almost all freedom of speech online. fedi can solve this.
<2023-04-16T04:01:57.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: because fedi, peertube and matrix are all composed of small components, one instance can get destroyed while the rest are fine. There's strength in numbers. For once you could say there's strength in diversity. One day I want to make a fedi instance of my own
<2023-04-16T04:03:18.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: I believe that decentralized services can bring back the wild west internet
<2023-04-17T01:55:23.000Z> foreign: I mean how hard is it really for the government to shut down all of the meaningful instances if they ever actually start to have high traffic? And even if it's left up, what's stopping them from just using rightwing instances as honeypots to go after the individual users instead? Or infiltrating them from within and fedposting at such a high level they have grounds to shut them down?
<2023-04-17T01:57:13.000Z> foreign: I guess I'm too retarded to see how different a decentralized platform is from like a micro internet.
<2023-04-17T02:12:23.000Z> foreign: I also just don't see these platforms becoming popular with anyone except radicals. Why would a normie ever use one of these platforms instead of twitter? That extra second it takes for that feed to load is enough reason for most people to never use something like this. If it isn't the most streamlined, easy to use, application it doesn't exist to most people. People get mocked for using twitter.com instead of the app. Something like this is so alien to most midwits.  And if you don't have normies drowning out your meaningful discussion it seems very easy for these places to be monitored by feds and no different than other fringe websites/forums. I say this with no real understanding of anything internet related, so I could be totally off base.
<2023-04-17T22:04:53.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: They'd need a legal justification to shut it down. America still has very strong free speech laws, that's why a lot of stuff is hosted in America and other western countries which have hardcore hatespeech legislation like Germany can't do a thing
<2023-04-17T22:07:18.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: of course they can contrive laws out of nothing to secure the power of the state, but we both know that if it came down to it the state would do anything to secure itself against a credible threat
<2023-04-17T22:13:40.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: I'm not going to respond to every single point you brought up because a lot of it is valid. It's important to recognize that this is all new and there's going to be growing pains as different problems arise. HOWEVER these problems, like feds infiltrating and fedposting so the instance gets shut down, can be solved, but just by the fact that nobody can foresee everything, a few people, like chudbuds, will go under during the process
<2023-04-17T22:17:46.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: Is it really necessary that everyone and their mother use fedi?  Look at what the mass proliferation of the smart phone did to the internet. Fedi may never be as popular as twitter, and that's ok. I have more of an elitist view on this. It doesn't need to be popular, it just needs to have the right people on it.
<2023-04-17T22:22:21.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: last thing, dissidents routinely get obliterated on every centralized service. Someone once said "definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result." We need to carve our own path instead of making new accounts on twitter or discord
<2023-04-18T01:26:19.000Z> foreign: You seem pretty well read on a lot of subjects. What are the sites/channels you regularly visit to learn about events both past and future? Any important books as well? These are the last questions I'll pester you with for a while lol. https://i.poastcdn.org/478d614d1f1b3e6fec3073c16076a7c8a8c749a67d07d6f09cde2c84d6e270ae.jpg
<2023-04-18T03:24:02.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: Academic Agent on youtube has been pretty influential in shaping my current worldview. Academic Agent has lots of guests on his livestreams and they all specialize in different subjects. AS FOR books, the book that shaped me the most is Paris 1919. It's a book about the Paris peace conference. Julius Evola has been influential, but don't start with his most famous book Revolt Against The Modern World, start with The Handbook For Rightwing Youth.  Other than that, I recently read Storm of Steel, the Kaiser's Memoirs, Rainbow Six Siege and am currently reading On Power The Natural History of Its Growth by Bertrand de Jouvenel
<2023-04-18T03:24:16.000Z> Wilhelm_Apologist: Good luck have fun