<2022-10-02T16:55:39.000Z> ViciousVickers@chudbuds.lol: You may find this funny. In the original draft of the support/visitation stipulation and order, there was a provision that neither party (Ralph or Faith) were allowed to talk about the case online UNLESS they were correcting inaccurate information.So, you goading Ralph about NOT paying child support would have meant that he had every right under the order to say that he has paid all his support (which, to be fair, he has—though the next payment is due Monday…so we’ll see if he keeps it up).However, his attorney didn’t like that provision. She re-wrote it to stipulate that neither party discuss the case online AT ALL. Thus making his correction of your goading a violation of the order. I doubt it’ll lead to any serious punishment, but I still find it hilarious. Imagine being Ralph’s attorney and modifying a stipulation dealing with online speech to be MORE restrictive. LMAO.